New Paper on the Beneficial Impacts of Nature Exposure for Amazon Employees; Results Suggest Stress Reduction Benefits

In these winter times when staying indoors feels especially magnetic, it’s important to reflect on the myriad of benefits that nature exposure can provide for our physical, mental, and emotional well-being — especially as employees throughout the US and across industries continue to report elevated levels of work stress.

Coming out just in time for indoor hibernation season, researchers from the University of Washington published a new experimental, 2-study report in the December issue of Urban Forestry & Urban Greening on the beneficial effects that day-to-day nature exposure can have on workers in their everyday lives. This was the first known study to longitudinally investigate nature contact at work in connection to employees’ psychological well-being, and also the first known study to control for important contextual (activity type, location) confounders. Results suggest stress-related benefits for spending time in more (versus less) natural outdoor settings

Authors Sara Perrins (Seattle Children’s Hospital), Edmund Seto (Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences), and Nature & Health Steering Committee Members Greg Bratman (School of Environmental and Forest Sciences) and Usha Varanasi (School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences) forged a new collaboration with Amazon to investigate psychological well-being effects associated with employee use of the Spheres–a 2-acre, multistory conservatory in the heart of downtown Seattle filled with over 40,000 plants that provides Amazon employees a nature-filled place for restoration and work.

Image source: AshlynG/Flickr, CC BY-ND 2.0 (G A, 2018).

Amazon and study authors wanted to know if nature contact at or near the workplace–whether through time spent at the Spheres or other natural environments throughout the day— would influence employee experiences of affect, stress, and symptoms of depression. 

In the first of their two studies, 153 participants were recruited via posters from Amazon’s downtown Seattle offices and company e-newsletters. Researchers asked participants how frequently they visited the Spheres and were given an online assortment of psychological well-being questionnaires. 

Results showed that more positive emotions were reported along with higher visitation to the Spheres. However, when taking into account participants’ various activities within the Spheres (for example, eating, drinking, socializing, working, etc), this positive association became weaker. 

In the second study, researchers followed 60 participants from the first study for two additional weeks with over 400 repeated survey assessments This time, researchers wanted to learn more about how ranges of nature exposure for people with different situations and circumstances (for example, with less/more nature present while out doing chores, exercising, eating, etc) might impact each participants’ overall state emotional health and stress levels. 

Researchers found that participants in more natural outdoor environments reported significantly less state anxiety than those in less natural outdoor settings even after taking activity and location into account. This finding is in line with the theory that nature contact reduces overall stress.

More experimental research is needed to understand the contexts and ways in which nature contact can affect workplace mental health and burnout.


Special Issue of Ecopsychology

Nature and Health’s Steering Committee Members Peter Kahn and Usha Varanasi recently contributed to the new issue of Ecopsychology! Peter Kahn was Editor-in-Chief for the special issue Reciprocal Healing: Nature, Health, and Wild Vitality and Usha Varanasi was published in Focusing Attention on Reciprocity Between Nature and Humans Can Be the Key to Reinvigorating Planetary Health.

All articles in this issue are free for one month. After that, access to these articles are limited to subscribers, libraries, etc.


Publication in Press

Focusing Attention on Reciprocity between Nature and Humans

Can be the Key to Reinvigorating Planetary Health

Usha Varanasi
Usha Varanasi

Usha Varanasi, Ph.D., College of the Environment, University of Washington

In Press, Ecopsychology Journal, http://home.liebertpub.com/publications/ecopsychology/300/overview
Mary Ann Liebert Inc., Publishers

This timely essay raises the importance of shifting individual and societal attention to preventive and precautionary measures to maintain human and ecological health. These measures require strategic rather than reactive approaches to human health and ecological crises. This essay points to the growing body of research that nature (wilderness to green and blue space) is necessary for people’s physical, mental, and emotional health. Such evidence should persuade the public and policymakers to proactively conserve ecosystems, reducing the need to rescue depleted species or repair and restore their degraded habitats. It concludes with a plea for focused attention on reciprocal healing of both nature and humans, which can occur only if our interaction with nature–be it wilderness, an urban park, a garden–is frequent and respectful. The author suggests that the nature-and-health paradigm may be the game-changing strategy needed to sustain grassroots awareness for halting, and hopefully, reversing the trajectory of decline in planetary health. Our very survival depends on redefining our relationship with nature with deep reverence and empathy. In summary, purposeful attention and respect for nature across all parts of society can reinvigorate planetary health.

Nature and people in wilderness, green, and blue spaces
Photo by Su Kim