Technological Nature and Human Well-Being

Citation

van den Bosch, M., Bird, W., and Kahn, P. ‘Technological nature and human well-being’, in Matilda van den Bosch, and William Bird (eds)Oxford Textbook of Nature and Public Health: The role of nature in improving the health of a population, Oxford Textbooks in Public Health (Oxford, 2018; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 Feb. 2018).


Abstract

In terms of physical and psychological well-being, does it matter that on a worldwide level we are replacing interactions with actual nature with technological nature—technologies that mediate, simulate, and augment the natural word? Research from three forms of technological nature are reviewed: a technological nature window, robot pets, and a telegarden. Results suggest that while interacting with technological nature is better than nothing, it is not as good as interacting with real nature. A concern with accepting technological nature is that it can shift the baseline downward for what counts as optimal well-being, as people across generations lose experiences with healthy baselines, a process referred to as environmental generational amnesia. One result is that we ask too little of the idea of urban sustainability, confusing biological living with human flourishing.