Physical Activity and Social Interaction Assessments in Schoolyard Settings Using the System for Observing Outdoor Play Environments in Neighborhood Schools (SOOPEN)

Citation

Hazlehurst, M. F., Wolf, K. L., Simmons, C., Nieto, C., Steiner, M. K., Garrett, K. A., … & Tandon, P. S. (2023). Physical activity and social interaction assessments in schoolyard settings using the System for Observing Outdoor Play Environments in Neighborhood Schools (SOOPEN). International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity20(1), 94. doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01483-5


A group of children play on a playground surrounded by mature trees.Schoolyards are important places where children can be active and build social skills. They can also serve as park spaces for the whole community when school is not in session. In this study, researchers wanted to learn how children and community members use schoolyards and how different schoolyard features may encourage physical activity and positive social interactions.

Researchers observed students and community visitors in three urban elementary schoolyards in Tacoma, Washington using a new tool called the System for Observing Outdoor Play Environments in Neighborhood Schools (SOOPEN). Some observations from 981 groups researchers studied:

  • During school recess, about 1 in 5 groups were engaged in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity—activities like running or active games.
  • Groups playing on paved areas were more likely to be active than those on grassy fields.
  • Groups with adult supervision were less active than those without direct supervision.
  • The design of the schoolyard did not appear to influence how often children interacted positively with each other.
  • Mixed-gender groups were more likely to be active and show more prosocial behavior.

Overall, this study shows that schoolyards play a meaningful role in supporting children’s physical activity and social development. It also demonstrates that SOOPEN is a useful tool for understanding how schoolyard design and group dynamics can shape healthy behaviors during and outside of school hours.

Abstract

Figure 1. (a) Schoolyard 1, (b) schoolyard 2, and (c) schoolyard 3 target areas for SOOPEN observations. Black outlines indicate the boundaries of each target area and white dots indicate the location where observers stood to conduct scans. For example, at School 3 (panel C), zone 1 is a paved surface, zone 2 is a covered basketball court (paved surface), zone 3 is a paved surface, zone 4 is a set of swings, zone 5 is a play structure, and zone 6 is a grass field bordered by a paved walking path

Background

The schoolyard environment provides key opportunities to promote physical activity and socioemotional development for children. Schoolyards can also serve as a community park resource outside of school hours. We aimed to: (i) implement and evaluate reliability of the System for Observing Outdoor Play Environments in Neighborhood Schools (SOOPEN), (ii) assess schoolyard use by children during recess and community members of all ages outside of school hours, and (iii) investigate relationships of schoolyard and children´s group characteristics with physical activity levels and prosocial interactions.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we observed student and community visitor behavior using SOOPEN at three urban elementary schoolyards in Tacoma, Washington, USA, prior to renovations intended to expand each facility’s use as a community park in neighborhoods with poor park access. We assessed interrater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients and described current levels of schoolyard use (at the group level), physical activity, and prosocial behavior. Physical activity was assessed on a five-point scale and dichotomized to indicate moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Social interactions were coded as prosocial, antisocial, or neutral. We examined associations of selected schoolyard features and group characteristics with group MVPA and prosocial behavior during recess using modified Poisson regression to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

We observed a total of 981 activity-defined, informal groups in the schoolyards, and achieved good to excellent interrater reliability using SOOPEN. Community use of the schoolyards during evenings and weekends was limited (n = 56 groups). During 26, 25–50 min recess periods (n = 833 groups), 19% of groups were engaged in MVPA. Schoolyard areas with paved surfaces were associated with more MVPA (PR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.23) compared to field/grass areas; supervised groups were associated with less MVPA than groups not directly supervised by an adult (PR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.96). Schoolyard characteristics were not associated with prosocial behavior. Mixed-gender groups were associated with more MVPA and more prosocial behavior.

Conclusions

Our study using SOOPEN, a reliable new activity observation tool, highlights the multi-dimensional dynamics of physical activity and social interactions in schoolyards, which could be leveraged to promote healthy behaviors during and outside of school hours.